RentZen LogoRentZen
Thanksgiving Sale30% offLimited time offer

Boghosian v Pinto

Last updated: October 12, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: June 30, 2026
Unit ***, 11 Ahrens Street West, Kitchener, Ontario N2H4B6
Contested Dispute
Application T2Filed by TenantDocument Order

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Subsections of RTA Quoted

29(2)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue

Citation: Boghosian v Pinto, LTB-T-078893-25

File Number: LTB-T-078893-25

Timeline

Hearing Date

Jun 2026

5 days

Order Date

Jun 30, 2026

Decision

The Tenants' application regarding tenant rights and harassment was dismissed because it was filed after the expiry of the one-year limitation period set out in section 29(2) of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

The Tenants applied for an order determining that the Landlord entered illegally, altered locks without providing replacement keys, substantially interfered with reasonable enjoyment, harassed or threatened the Tenants, and withheld vital services.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Section 29(2) of the Act establishes a one-year limitation period for claims under section 29.
  • The tenancy terminated on September 17, 2024, pursuant to prior order LTB-L-059072-24-RV, and the application was filed on September 19, 2025, making it out of time and subject to dismissal.
  • The Tenant's request for an adjournment was denied as the requested documents were not relevant to the limitation period issue.
  • The Board lacks the discretion to hear an application filed outside the limitation period.
  • The issue of when the tenancy ended is subject to issue estoppel as it was previously determined by the Board.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Tenant argued that the lease was set to run past September 17, 2024, and that the tenancy ended on a different date than previously determined.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenant requested an adjournment because he was in the hospital and lacked access to supporting documents. Tenant argued that the application should be heard despite the limitation period and disputed the termination date of the tenancy.

Unlock Order Content

Procedural Errors

Filed the application outside the one-year limitation period.

Unlock Order Content
Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Kong v 2** Jarvis LP

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
TORONTO
Review Order

The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.

ContentionLow

Downey-Thomas v Lacson

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Twaseen v Zhang

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
NORTH YORK
Application Withdrawn

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

C***** Barrientos v Sherritt

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

An LTB order dismisses a tenant's T2 application for substantial interference, maintenance failures, and harassment after finding the allegations unproven.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Kong v 2** Jarvis LP

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
TORONTO
Review Order

The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.

ContentionLow

Downey-Thomas v Lacson

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Twaseen v Zhang

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
NORTH YORK
Application Withdrawn

The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

C***** Barrientos v Sherritt

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

An LTB order dismisses a tenant's T2 application for substantial interference, maintenance failures, and harassment after finding the allegations unproven.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform