Illegal Entry - LTB Orders
Cases of landlords entering the rental unit without proper notice or permission.
Related Forms
Dispute Stats
Total Orders
1,708
Orders since 2024
836
Contested dispute only. Click to switch between order outcomes
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Celik v Celik
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application because the Residential Tenancies Act did not apply due to the shared use of kitchen and bathroom facilities with the landlord and the landlord's mother.
Armstrong v Rubio
The Tenant withdrew their application concerning illegal entry and substantial interference, and the LTB file was closed.
Ferk v Ottawa Community Housing Corporation
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's review request, finding no serious error or denial of procedural fairness in the original order concerning maintenance and tenant rights.
Khan v Haque and Begum
The Tenant's T1, T2, T5, and T6 applications were dismissed as statute-barred because they were filed years after the tenancy had ended, well beyond the one-year limitation period under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
Beamish and Kaarsemaker v Duncan
Tenant-initiated applications regarding maintenance, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed as withdrawn upon the Tenants' request.
Beamish v Duncan
The tenants' applications regarding maintenance, tenant rights, and bad faith eviction were dismissed as withdrawn upon the tenants' request at the hearing.
Khan v Nusrat
Tenant applications regarding maintenance, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed as an abuse of process because the parties had previously entered into a valid mutual settlement agreement and release resolving all tenancy claims.
Khan v Haque and Begum
The Tenant's T1, T2, T5, and T6 applications were dismissed as statute-barred because they were filed years after the tenancy had ended, well beyond the one-year limitation period under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
Beamish and Kaarsemaker v Duncan
Tenant-initiated applications regarding maintenance, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed as withdrawn upon the Tenants' request.
Beamish v Duncan
The tenants' applications regarding maintenance, tenant rights, and bad faith eviction were dismissed as withdrawn upon the tenants' request at the hearing.
Khan v Nusrat
Tenant applications regarding maintenance, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed as an abuse of process because the parties had previously entered into a valid mutual settlement agreement and release resolving all tenancy claims.
Khan v Haque and Begum
The Tenant's T1, T2, T5, and T6 applications were dismissed as statute-barred because they were filed years after the tenancy had ended, well beyond the one-year limitation period under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
Beamish and Kaarsemaker v Duncan
Tenant-initiated applications regarding maintenance, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed as withdrawn upon the Tenants' request.
Beamish v Duncan
The tenants' applications regarding maintenance, tenant rights, and bad faith eviction were dismissed as withdrawn upon the tenants' request at the hearing.
Khan v Nusrat
Tenant applications regarding maintenance, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed as an abuse of process because the parties had previously entered into a valid mutual settlement agreement and release resolving all tenancy claims.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Celik v Celik
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application because the Residential Tenancies Act did not apply due to the shared use of kitchen and bathroom facilities with the landlord and the landlord's mother.
Khan v Haque and Begum
The Tenant's T1, T2, T5, and T6 applications were dismissed as statute-barred because they were filed years after the tenancy had ended, well beyond the one-year limitation period under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
Beamish and Kaarsemaker v Duncan
Tenant-initiated applications regarding maintenance, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed as withdrawn upon the Tenants' request.
Beamish v Duncan
The tenants' applications regarding maintenance, tenant rights, and bad faith eviction were dismissed as withdrawn upon the tenants' request at the hearing.
Khan v Nusrat
Tenant applications regarding maintenance, harassment, and illegal entry were dismissed as an abuse of process because the parties had previously entered into a valid mutual settlement agreement and release resolving all tenancy claims.
Downey-Thomas v Lacson
The Tenant's application alleging illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment was dismissed because it failed to provide dates and particulars for the alleged conduct, violating principles of procedural fairness.
Celik v Celik
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application because the Residential Tenancies Act did not apply due to the shared use of kitchen and bathroom facilities with the landlord and the landlord's mother.
Armstrong v Rubio
The Tenant withdrew their application concerning illegal entry and substantial interference, and the LTB file was closed.
Ferk v Ottawa Community Housing Corporation
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied a tenant's review request, finding no serious error or denial of procedural fairness in the original order concerning maintenance and tenant rights.
Unlock Complete Case History
Access our complete database of similar cases to build stronger arguments and increase your chances of success at the Landlord Tenant Board.
See how adjudicators typically rule on cases similar to yours
Access complete case histories to strengthen your position
Reference specific past orders during your hearing
Need assistance from an expert?
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The N4 Notice Filing Guide: Common Pitfalls That Cost Ontario Landlords Their Cases
Master the N4 Notice to End Tenancy for Non-Payment of Rent with this comprehensive guide covering proper completion, common errors, and costly mistakes that lead to dismissed applications at the LTB.
The Fine Line Between Fraud and Vulnerability: Income Misrepresentation in Ontario's Subsidized Housing
A comprehensive analysis of income misrepresentation cases in rent-geared-to-income housing reveals the stark difference between intentional fraud costing hundreds of thousands and vulnerable tenants who genuinely struggle with verification requirements.
Toronto LTB Paralegals for Landlords: How to Find the Right Legal Help (2026 Guide)
Need a landlord paralegal in Toronto? Learn what licensed paralegals do at the LTB, how they help with evictions and rent arrears, and meet experienced GTA professionals ranked by real case records.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform