RentZen LogoRentZen
Thanksgiving Sale30% offLimited time offer

Qi v Lu

Last updated: August 9, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: February 6, 2026
*** PRINCE EDWARD BLVD, THORNHILL, ON L3T 7E9
Contested Dispute
Application T1;T6Filed by TenantDocument Order

Dispute resolved in

Agreement

Subsections of RTA Quoted

106(10)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue

Citation: Qi v Lu, LTB-T-055220-25

File Number: LTB-T-055220-25

Timeline

Hearing Date

Feb 2026

4 days

Order Date

Feb 6, 2026

7 months

Tenancy End Date

Aug 2026

Decision

The parties consented to a settlement where the Tenants withdrew their application and agreed to vacate the unit by August 24, 2026, in exchange for a payment from the Landlord.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenants applied for an order determining that the Landlord collected or retained money illegally and failed to meet maintenance obligations. The parties reached a settlement during the hearing to terminate the tenancy and resolve all issues.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The parties reached a consent order.
  • The tenancy is terminated as of August 24, 2026.
  • Landlord is to pay the Tenants $13,400.00 by May 25, 2026.
  • Tenants shall resume paying rent starting April 25, 2026.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

The Landlord agreed to a settlement payment of $13,400.00 to the Tenants.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

The Tenants initiated the application for illegal rent collection and maintenance issues but consented to settle the matter.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content
Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionExtreme

Smith v Lee

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Boucetta v Metcap

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
kanata
Review Order

The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Kong v 2** Jarvis LP

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
TORONTO
Review Order

The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.

ContentionLow

Toronto Community Housing Corporation v Palacios

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB found that an unauthorized occupant committed illegal acts and impaired safety at the residential complex, but granted the Tenant conditional relief from eviction.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionExtreme

Smith v Lee

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

An LTB order awards a Landlord unpaid water charges and filing fees after the Tenant vacates the rental unit.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionLow

Boucetta v Metcap

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
kanata
Review Order

The LTB dismissed a tenant's review request regarding a maintenance order, finding no serious errors in the original proceeding.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
ContentionLow

Kong v 2** Jarvis LP

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
TORONTO
Review Order

The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the tenant's review request, confirming the dismissal of the tenant's applications for failing to comply with interim disclosure and amendment orders.

ContentionLow

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform