RentZen LogoRentZen
Thanksgiving Sale30% offLimited time offer

Liverpool Road Limited Partnership v Smith

Last updated: October 12, 2026

Share:

Order

Order Date: July 13, 2026
*** WHARF ST, PICKERING, ON L1W1A3
Contested Dispute
Application L2Filed by LandlordDocument Order

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Notices Sent

Substantial interference (N5)

Subsections of RTA Quoted

64(3)83(1)(b)83(2)
ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue

Citation: Liverpool Road Limited Partnership v Smith, 2026 ONLTB 54066, LTB-L-042441-26

File Number: LTB-L-042441-26

Timeline

Hearing Date

Jul 2026

5 days

Order Date

Jul 13, 2026

18 days

Tenancy End Date

Jul 2026

Decision

The Landlord's application for termination and payment of utility arrears is granted. The tenancy is terminated effective July 31, 2026, and the Tenant is ordered to pay $2,008.37 in unpaid utility costs and filing fees.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

The Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to substantial interference resulting from unpaid water utility bills, which were transferred to the property tax bill. The Landlord also claimed compensation for unpaid utilities and filing costs.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • The request to combine files with two separate L1 applications was denied as they involve different legal tests and separate tenancies.
  • The Tenant's request for an adjournment to secure new counsel was denied as it was not necessary for a fair hearing.
  • The Landlord proved on a balance of probabilities that the Tenant substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by failing to pay water utility costs as required under the tenancy agreement.
  • The Landlord's amended application to increase the claim for unpaid water utility to $1,822.37 was properly served and accepted.
  • Relief from eviction was considered under s. 83, but a payment plan was denied due to the Tenant's lack of income, though eviction was postponed to July 31, 2026.
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Submitted that the Tenant substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by failing to pay utility costs, resulting in financial prejudice if adjourned.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

The Landlord's Agent testified that the unpaid water bill of $1,822.37 was transferred to the property tax bill and that multiple discussions with the Tenant yielded no results.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Submitted that files should be combined due to overlapping facts and the same parties, and requested an adjournment to secure new counsel.

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

The Tenant requested an adjournment and to combine files because his counsel was suspended. The Tenant acknowledged he had not paid the water bill and was responsible for it under the lease.

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Failure to pay utility costs resulting in transfer to property tax billLack of viable income for proposed payment plan

Unlock Order Content
Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
London

The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionModerate

Chhabria v Kaur

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 29, 2026
BRAMPTON

The LTB granted a conditional tenancy order allowing relief from eviction after finding that the Tenants substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by parking on the lawn, subject to strict conditions and payment of filing costs.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

McFarland v Smith

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB dismissed claims for substantial interference and overcrowding, noted rent arrears were paid, found persistent late payment, and granted relief from eviction subject to conditions.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Windsor Essex Community Housing Corporation v Shat

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 27, 2026
WINDSOR

An LTB order conditionally dismissed an eviction application for substantial interference due to excessive emails, requiring the tenant to use formal complaint procedures and pay filing costs.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 31, 2026
London

The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionModerate

Chhabria v Kaur

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 29, 2026
BRAMPTON

The LTB granted a conditional tenancy order allowing relief from eviction after finding that the Tenants substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by parking on the lawn, subject to strict conditions and payment of filing costs.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

McFarland v Smith

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

The LTB dismissed claims for substantial interference and overcrowding, noted rent arrears were paid, found persistent late payment, and granted relief from eviction subject to conditions.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionLow

Windsor Essex Community Housing Corporation v Shat

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 27, 2026
WINDSOR

An LTB order conditionally dismissed an eviction application for substantial interference due to excessive emails, requiring the tenant to use formal complaint procedures and pay filing costs.

Landlord Aggravating Factor
Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
ContentionHigh

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform