Liverpool Road Limited Partnership v Smith
Last updated: October 12, 2026
Order
Decision in favor of
Landlord
Dispute Categories
Notices Sent
Subsections of RTA Quoted
Agree with the ruling?
PDF provided by the Ontario LTB Order Catalogue
Citation: Liverpool Road Limited Partnership v Smith, 2026 ONLTB 54066, LTB-L-042441-26
File Number: LTB-L-042441-26
Timeline
Hearing Date
Jul 2026
Order Date
Jul 13, 2026
Tenancy End Date
Jul 2026
Decision
The Landlord's application for termination and payment of utility arrears is granted. The tenancy is terminated effective July 31, 2026, and the Tenant is ordered to pay $2,008.37 in unpaid utility costs and filing fees.
Dispute
The Landlord applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant due to substantial interference resulting from unpaid water utility bills, which were transferred to the property tax bill. The Landlord also claimed compensation for unpaid utilities and filing costs.
Determinations
- The request to combine files with two separate L1 applications was denied as they involve different legal tests and separate tenancies.
- The Tenant's request for an adjournment to secure new counsel was denied as it was not necessary for a fair hearing.
- The Landlord proved on a balance of probabilities that the Tenant substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by failing to pay water utility costs as required under the tenancy agreement.
- The Landlord's amended application to increase the claim for unpaid water utility to $1,822.37 was properly served and accepted.
- Relief from eviction was considered under s. 83, but a payment plan was denied due to the Tenant's lack of income, though eviction was postponed to July 31, 2026.
Landlord's Arguments
Arguments
Submitted that the Tenant substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by failing to pay utility costs, resulting in financial prejudice if adjourned.
Actions and Evidence
The Landlord's Agent testified that the unpaid water bill of $1,822.37 was transferred to the property tax bill and that multiple discussions with the Tenant yielded no results.
Considerations
Tenant's Arguments
Arguments
Submitted that files should be combined due to overlapping facts and the same parties, and requested an adjournment to secure new counsel.
Actions and Evidence
The Tenant requested an adjournment and to combine files because his counsel was suspended. The Tenant acknowledged he had not paid the water bill and was responsible for it under the lease.
Considerations
Failure to pay utility costs resulting in transfer to property tax billLack of viable income for proposed payment plan
Similar Cases
Click to switch between order outcomes
Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last
The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.
The LTB granted a conditional tenancy order allowing relief from eviction after finding that the Tenants substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by parking on the lawn, subject to strict conditions and payment of filing costs.
McFarland v Smith
The LTB dismissed claims for substantial interference and overcrowding, noted rent arrears were paid, found persistent late payment, and granted relief from eviction subject to conditions.
Windsor Essex Community Housing Corporation v Shat
An LTB order conditionally dismissed an eviction application for substantial interference due to excessive emails, requiring the tenant to use formal complaint procedures and pay filing costs.
Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last
The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.
The LTB granted a conditional tenancy order allowing relief from eviction after finding that the Tenants substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by parking on the lawn, subject to strict conditions and payment of filing costs.
McFarland v Smith
The LTB dismissed claims for substantial interference and overcrowding, noted rent arrears were paid, found persistent late payment, and granted relief from eviction subject to conditions.
Windsor Essex Community Housing Corporation v Shat
An LTB order conditionally dismissed an eviction application for substantial interference due to excessive emails, requiring the tenant to use formal complaint procedures and pay filing costs.
Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last
The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.
The LTB granted a conditional tenancy order allowing relief from eviction after finding that the Tenants substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by parking on the lawn, subject to strict conditions and payment of filing costs.
McFarland v Smith
The LTB dismissed claims for substantial interference and overcrowding, noted rent arrears were paid, found persistent late payment, and granted relief from eviction subject to conditions.
Windsor Essex Community Housing Corporation v Shat
An LTB order conditionally dismissed an eviction application for substantial interference due to excessive emails, requiring the tenant to use formal complaint procedures and pay filing costs.
Old Oak Properties Inc. v Last
The Landlord established substantial interference due to excessive communications, but relief from eviction was granted allowing the tenancy to continue on conditions.
The LTB granted a conditional tenancy order allowing relief from eviction after finding that the Tenants substantially interfered with the Landlord's rights by parking on the lawn, subject to strict conditions and payment of filing costs.
McFarland v Smith
The LTB dismissed claims for substantial interference and overcrowding, noted rent arrears were paid, found persistent late payment, and granted relief from eviction subject to conditions.
Windsor Essex Community Housing Corporation v Shat
An LTB order conditionally dismissed an eviction application for substantial interference due to excessive emails, requiring the tenant to use formal complaint procedures and pay filing costs.
The LTB terminated the tenancy and ordered eviction because the Tenant persistently interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of other occupants through excessive noise and property damage.
St. Thomas - Elgin Social Services v McEwen
The LTB granted relief from eviction subject to conditions where the Landlord proved substantial interference related to pet waste and pest control access.
London Property Corp v Strojek
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's review request and confirmed an ex parte eviction order under Section 78, holding that the Tenant should have filed a motion to set aside rather than a review.
Northumberland County Housing Corporation v Throop
The LTB denied the tenant's motion to set aside a termination order after finding that the tenant breached the conditions of a mediated settlement.
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Common Reasons Landlords Lose at the LTB (And How to Avoid Them)
Learn from real LTB cases why landlord applications fail. Discover the most common mistakes that lead to dismissed applications and practical strategies to strengthen your case and protect your investment.

Do You Need a Lawyer or Paralegal for the LTB? A Cost-Benefit Guide for Ontario Landlords and Tenants
Should you hire a lawyer or paralegal for your Landlord and Tenant Board case? Compare representation costs, LTB fee recovery limits, and when self-representation makes sense for Ontario rental disputes.

When Payment Plans Fail: Understanding Breach of Conditional Orders and Second Chances at the LTB
Exploring what happens when tenants default on LTB-ordered payment plans, the strict consequences of breaching conditional orders, and the rare circumstances where further relief might be granted in Ontario.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform
