A.D. v D.P.L.

Last updated: July 30, 2024

Order

Ordered by ,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: May 19, 2016
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Tenant

Dispute Categories

ContentionHigh

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: A.D. v D.P.L., 2016 CanLII 38758 (ON LTB)

File Number: TET-67820-16

Timeline

Hearing Date

Apr 2016

20 days

Order Date

May 19, 2016

Decision

The Landlord failed to meet maintenance obligations and comply with health or maintenance standards regarding the bed bug issue. The Tenant is awarded a rent abatement of $595.80 and $1,000 for replacement of damaged property and cleaning costs, as well as the $45 application fee, for a total of $1,640.80 owed to the Tenant.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenant applied for an order determining that Landlord failed to meet maintenance obligations or comply with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards, specifically regarding a bed bug issue.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Bed bugs first appeared on 2015-12-26, Landlord took quick action to have unit inspected
  • More bugs found on 2016-01-05, confirmed by exterminator
  • It took three more applications to deal with the bugs, final application was end of March 2016
  • Tenant and her daughter were being bitten regularly, their bedding and some furniture was affected
  • Tenant finally vacated the unit on 2016-04-30
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Landlord took quick action to have the unit inspected on 2015-12-29 when the bed bugs first appeared, but the problem persisted for 3 months despite further extermination efforts.

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Tenant and her daughter were being bitten regularly, their bedding and some furniture was affected by the bed bugs.

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Professional business person

Reach Landlords & Tenants

Advertise your legal or rental services to our audience

Sponsored

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

John v Manor Park Management

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB dismisses Ottawa tenants' claims that their landlord steered potential lease assignees to other vacant units.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

McConnell v Torbill Holdings Ltd.

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Picton

Tenant's maintenance application dismissed by LTB for being too vague and failing to provide details for over a year.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Shakori v Frolov

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 22, 2026
Etobicoke

Etobicoke landlord wins $41,000 judgment after Board rules a $1.42 error does not invalidate an eviction notice.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
ContentionExtreme

ZHANG v CALVILLO

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB denies tenants' review request after finding no error in the original eviction order despite tenants' claims of hardship and rent waivers.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionHigh

John v Manor Park Management

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins

LTB dismisses Ottawa tenants' claims that their landlord steered potential lease assignees to other vacant units.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

McConnell v Torbill Holdings Ltd.

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
January 21, 2026
Picton

Tenant's maintenance application dismissed by LTB for being too vague and failing to provide details for over a year.

Testimony Contested
ContentionModerate

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform