Michael Di Salle

Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions

Overview

Total Orders

2,351

Orders since 2024

38

Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant since 2024

5

Landlord's Notice Found Invalid since 2024

0

Hearing to Order
7days
Order to Termination
11days

Order Outcomes
PRO

Contested disputes are those where both parties were present at the hearing

PRO
Landlord Wins
30 orders60%
Tenant Wins
30 orders30%
Agreement
30 orders10%

Subscribe to view detailed win rates

Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 5 Orders since 2024
PRO

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Tenant

Please subscribe v Please subscribe v

Reason for Relief

Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.

Who Wins

Landlord

Unlock Full Access to Michael Di Salle's Decisions

Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

Gain insights on how Michael Di Salle typically rules on cases like yours

Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 0 Orders since 2024
PRO

Contested Dispute by Category
PRO

    • Property Damage16

      Landlord Win Rate: 81.25%

    • Personal Use14

      Landlord Win Rate: 92.86%

    • Substantial Interference14

      Landlord Win Rate: 64.29%

    • Rent Increase13

      Landlord Win Rate: 92.31%

    • Persistent Late Payment7

      Landlord Win Rate: 57.14%

    • Illegal Act5

      Landlord Win Rate: 20%

    Unlock Full Access to Michael Di Salle's Decisions

    Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

    Gain insights on how Michael Di Salle typically rules on cases like yours

    Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

    Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument

    Latest Orders

    PRO

    Sarkisian v Mullins

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    August 22, 2024
    Vanier

    Vanier tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $7,710 rent, ordered to pay $5,938.19 to landlord.

    ContentionHigh

    Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Delgado and Murcia

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    August 21, 2024
    Toronto

    Toronto tenants evicted for non-payment of rent, owe $11.94 to landlord.

    ContentionLow

    Hazelview Property Services Inc. v Bahadur

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    August 19, 2024
    North York

    North York tenant evicted for non-payment of $7,581.67 in rent, ordered to pay $5,773.39.

    ContentionModerate

    Oleksiienko v Baird

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    July 31, 2024
    McNab/Braeside

    McNab/Braeside tenants evicted for non-payment of rent, owe $4,280.38 to landlords.

    ContentionLow

    Galaxy Real Estate Core Ontario Properties LP v Chauhan

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    July 10, 2024
    Hamilton

    Hamilton tenant faces eviction for non-payment of $9,238.75 in rent.

    ContentionHigh

    H&R Property Management Ltd. v Farhaneh

    Uncontested Dispute
    Landlord Wins
    July 4, 2024
    Mississauga

    Mississauga landlord wins $8,614.65 from tenant for non-payment of rent, tenant faces eviction.

    ContentionHigh

    Unlock Full Access to Michael Di Salle's Decisions

    Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.

    Gain insights on how Michael Di Salle typically rules on cases like yours

    Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence

    Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument