John Cashmore
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
936
487
53
21
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 53 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to John Cashmore's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how John Cashmore typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 21 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to John Cashmore's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how John Cashmore typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Breach Of Conditions41
Landlord Win Rate: 29.27%
- Harassment32
Landlord Win Rate: 34.38%
- Property Damage25
Landlord Win Rate: 48%
- Personal Use22
Landlord Win Rate: 45.45%
- Other20
Landlord Win Rate: 55%
- Illegal Entry16
Landlord Win Rate: 25%
Unlock Full Access to John Cashmore's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how John Cashmore typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Welling v Bettencourt
The Tenant's application alleging substantial interference, bad faith, and maintenance failures was dismissed as abandoned because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Taufiq v Sharma
The Landlord's application for costs related to substantial interference and property damage was withdrawn by consent after the parties resolved the issues.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
Killam Apartment Reit v Mulligan
The LTB granted a review order and de novo hearing, terminating the tenancy for unauthorized transfer of occupancy of a mobile home site but postponing eviction to February 28, 2027.
Dazell v Dyson
The tenants requested to withdraw their applications regarding substantial interference and maintenance, which the Board consented to.
Hastings Local Housing Corporation v Smith
Following a granted review request and de novo hearing, the Landlord and Tenant consented to an order terminating the tenancy.
Welling v Bettencourt
The Tenant's application alleging substantial interference, bad faith, and maintenance failures was dismissed as abandoned because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Taufiq v Sharma
The Landlord's application for costs related to substantial interference and property damage was withdrawn by consent after the parties resolved the issues.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
Killam Apartment Reit v Mulligan
The LTB granted a review order and de novo hearing, terminating the tenancy for unauthorized transfer of occupancy of a mobile home site but postponing eviction to February 28, 2027.
Dazell v Dyson
The tenants requested to withdraw their applications regarding substantial interference and maintenance, which the Board consented to.
Hastings Local Housing Corporation v Smith
Following a granted review request and de novo hearing, the Landlord and Tenant consented to an order terminating the tenancy.
Welling v Bettencourt
The Tenant's application alleging substantial interference, bad faith, and maintenance failures was dismissed as abandoned because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Taufiq v Sharma
The Landlord's application for costs related to substantial interference and property damage was withdrawn by consent after the parties resolved the issues.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
Killam Apartment Reit v Mulligan
The LTB granted a review order and de novo hearing, terminating the tenancy for unauthorized transfer of occupancy of a mobile home site but postponing eviction to February 28, 2027.
Dazell v Dyson
The tenants requested to withdraw their applications regarding substantial interference and maintenance, which the Board consented to.
Hastings Local Housing Corporation v Smith
Following a granted review request and de novo hearing, the Landlord and Tenant consented to an order terminating the tenancy.
Welling v Bettencourt
The Tenant's application alleging substantial interference, bad faith, and maintenance failures was dismissed as abandoned because the Tenant failed to attend the hearing.
Taufiq v Sharma
The Landlord's application for costs related to substantial interference and property damage was withdrawn by consent after the parties resolved the issues.
Twaseen v Zhang
The tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment was withdrawn upon request and the file was closed.
Killam Apartment Reit v Mulligan
The LTB granted a review order and de novo hearing, terminating the tenancy for unauthorized transfer of occupancy of a mobile home site but postponing eviction to February 28, 2027.
Dazell v Dyson
The tenants requested to withdraw their applications regarding substantial interference and maintenance, which the Board consented to.
Hastings Local Housing Corporation v Smith
Following a granted review request and de novo hearing, the Landlord and Tenant consented to an order terminating the tenancy.
Unlock Full Access to John Cashmore's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how John Cashmore typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Tenant Privacy Rights: What Landlords Can and Cannot Do in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to tenant privacy rights in Ontario, exploring landlord entry rules, notice requirements, and real LTB cases showing how privacy violations are handled and remedied.
LTB Orders Go Public: What Ontario's Open Data Release Means for Landlords, Tenants, and RentZen
Tribunals Ontario is publishing final Landlord and Tenant Board orders on the Open Data Catalogue. Learn what changed in July 2026, why it matters for transparency, and how RentZen is shifting to official public data.
Brampton Tenant Paralegals: How to Find LTB Representation and Defend Your Rights (2026)
Facing eviction or landlord harassment in Brampton? Learn what tenant paralegals do at the LTB, when to hire one, and meet Peel Region advocates ranked by real tribunal records.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform