James Campbell
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
212
144
21
9
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 21 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to James Campbell's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how James Campbell typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 9 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to James Campbell's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how James Campbell typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Property Damage12
Landlord Win Rate: 75%
- Personal Use7
Landlord Win Rate: 57.14%
- Safety Concerns7
Landlord Win Rate: 71.43%
- Harassment6
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Other5
Landlord Win Rate: 80%
- Bad Faith Eviction4
Landlord Win Rate: 0%
Unlock Full Access to James Campbell's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how James Campbell typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Divert v Kuhn
Tenant in St Thomas evicted for repeatedly failing to prepare for mandatory bed bug treatments.
Minto Multi-Res Income 1, LP v Picard
Tenant in Nepean evicted for substantial interference involving unit flooding and harassment of neighbors.
Kitchener tenants ordered to vacate or pay $4,826.96 following non-payment hearing.
FIRST ROCK PROPERTIES LTD v OSBORNE
Hamilton tenant evicted after allowing all utilities to be disconnected and refusing to communicate with the landlord.
Etobicoke landlord's eviction application dismissed after he admitted to blocking the tenant, failing to prove her conduct during the N5 voiding period.
1916923 Ontario Inc v Scott-Montgomery
A Toronto landlord's eviction application was dismissed because they served four different N5 notices and tried to rely on the wrong one at the hearing.
Divert v Kuhn
Tenant in St Thomas evicted for repeatedly failing to prepare for mandatory bed bug treatments.
Minto Multi-Res Income 1, LP v Picard
Tenant in Nepean evicted for substantial interference involving unit flooding and harassment of neighbors.
Kitchener tenants ordered to vacate or pay $4,826.96 following non-payment hearing.
FIRST ROCK PROPERTIES LTD v OSBORNE
Hamilton tenant evicted after allowing all utilities to be disconnected and refusing to communicate with the landlord.
Etobicoke landlord's eviction application dismissed after he admitted to blocking the tenant, failing to prove her conduct during the N5 voiding period.
1916923 Ontario Inc v Scott-Montgomery
A Toronto landlord's eviction application was dismissed because they served four different N5 notices and tried to rely on the wrong one at the hearing.
Divert v Kuhn
Tenant in St Thomas evicted for repeatedly failing to prepare for mandatory bed bug treatments.
Minto Multi-Res Income 1, LP v Picard
Tenant in Nepean evicted for substantial interference involving unit flooding and harassment of neighbors.
Kitchener tenants ordered to vacate or pay $4,826.96 following non-payment hearing.
FIRST ROCK PROPERTIES LTD v OSBORNE
Hamilton tenant evicted after allowing all utilities to be disconnected and refusing to communicate with the landlord.
Etobicoke landlord's eviction application dismissed after he admitted to blocking the tenant, failing to prove her conduct during the N5 voiding period.
1916923 Ontario Inc v Scott-Montgomery
A Toronto landlord's eviction application was dismissed because they served four different N5 notices and tried to rely on the wrong one at the hearing.
Divert v Kuhn
Tenant in St Thomas evicted for repeatedly failing to prepare for mandatory bed bug treatments.
Minto Multi-Res Income 1, LP v Picard
Tenant in Nepean evicted for substantial interference involving unit flooding and harassment of neighbors.
Kitchener tenants ordered to vacate or pay $4,826.96 following non-payment hearing.
FIRST ROCK PROPERTIES LTD v OSBORNE
Hamilton tenant evicted after allowing all utilities to be disconnected and refusing to communicate with the landlord.
Etobicoke landlord's eviction application dismissed after he admitted to blocking the tenant, failing to prove her conduct during the N5 voiding period.
1916923 Ontario Inc v Scott-Montgomery
A Toronto landlord's eviction application was dismissed because they served four different N5 notices and tried to rely on the wrong one at the hearing.
Unlock Full Access to James Campbell's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how James Campbell typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The Rent Arrears Calculation Maze: How Small Errors Lead to Big Losses at the LTB
Discover how minor calculation mistakes in N4 notices and rent arrears can cost landlords thousands at Ontario's LTB. Learn from real cases and avoid costly errors.
The Rent Increase Rulebook: Understanding Above-Guideline Increases and Capital Expenditure Claims in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to above-guideline rent increases in Ontario, exploring how landlords justify capital expenditure claims, common pitfalls that lead to dismissed applications, and what tenants need to know about challenging these increases.
Rent Withholding and Set-Off Rights: When Tenants Can Legally Stop Paying Rent in Ontario
Understand the legal boundaries of rent withholding in Ontario through real LTB cases, learning when it's justified versus when it leads to eviction and financial consequences.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform