Brenda Mercer
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
432
428
88
13
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 88 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Brenda Mercer's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Brenda Mercer typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 13 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Brenda Mercer's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Brenda Mercer typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Maintenance Issues17
Landlord Win Rate: 52.94%
- Bad Faith Eviction15
Landlord Win Rate: 53.33%
- Tenant Rights15
Landlord Win Rate: 53.33%
- Harassment14
Landlord Win Rate: 42.86%
- Property Damage11
Landlord Win Rate: 63.64%
- Safety Concerns10
Landlord Win Rate: 60%
Unlock Full Access to Brenda Mercer's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Brenda Mercer typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
The Landlord's application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's application alleging bad faith eviction was dismissed because the Landlord demonstrated that a delay in occupying the unit was caused by unforeseen structural and zoning issues.
Ahluwalia v Metz
The Landlord's application for eviction due to safety concerns was dismissed, but the Board granted the Tenant's request to terminate the tenancy.
The Landlord's application for termination and eviction was dismissed because the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Landlord was found to have acted in bad faith by serving an N12 notice and failing to occupy the unit, resulting in a compensation order for the Tenant.
METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Hijazi and Yaktin
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant for non-payment of rent.
The Landlord's application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's application alleging bad faith eviction was dismissed because the Landlord demonstrated that a delay in occupying the unit was caused by unforeseen structural and zoning issues.
Ahluwalia v Metz
The Landlord's application for eviction due to safety concerns was dismissed, but the Board granted the Tenant's request to terminate the tenancy.
The Landlord's application for termination and eviction was dismissed because the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Landlord was found to have acted in bad faith by serving an N12 notice and failing to occupy the unit, resulting in a compensation order for the Tenant.
METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Hijazi and Yaktin
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant for non-payment of rent.
The Landlord's application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's application alleging bad faith eviction was dismissed because the Landlord demonstrated that a delay in occupying the unit was caused by unforeseen structural and zoning issues.
Ahluwalia v Metz
The Landlord's application for eviction due to safety concerns was dismissed, but the Board granted the Tenant's request to terminate the tenancy.
The Landlord's application for termination and eviction was dismissed because the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Landlord was found to have acted in bad faith by serving an N12 notice and failing to occupy the unit, resulting in a compensation order for the Tenant.
METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Hijazi and Yaktin
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant for non-payment of rent.
The Landlord's application for non-payment of rent was dismissed because the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Tenant's application alleging bad faith eviction was dismissed because the Landlord demonstrated that a delay in occupying the unit was caused by unforeseen structural and zoning issues.
Ahluwalia v Metz
The Landlord's application for eviction due to safety concerns was dismissed, but the Board granted the Tenant's request to terminate the tenancy.
The Landlord's application for termination and eviction was dismissed because the Landlord failed to attend the hearing.
The Landlord was found to have acted in bad faith by serving an N12 notice and failing to occupy the unit, resulting in a compensation order for the Tenant.
METCAP LIVING MANAGEMENT INC. v Hijazi and Yaktin
The Landlord was granted an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant for non-payment of rent.
Unlock Full Access to Brenda Mercer's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Brenda Mercer typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Conditional Orders and Payment Plans: When the LTB Gives Tenants a Second Chance
Explore how conditional orders and payment plans work at Ontario's LTB, examining real cases where tenants avoided eviction and the factors that influence these crucial second chances.

The Digital Divide: How Technology is Changing LTB Proceedings and Access to Justice
Explore how the shift to virtual hearings and digital processes at the LTB is creating new challenges and opportunities for access to justice. Learn about technological barriers, procedural fairness issues, and what parties need to know about navigating digital proceedings.

LTB Maximum Claim Amount in Ontario: What the $50,000 Cap Means for Landlords and Tenants (2025)
Ontario raised the Landlord and Tenant Board monetary limit to $50,000 on October 1, 2025. Learn how RTA section 207 works, what landlords and tenants can claim, and when to stay at the LTB vs. go to court.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform